Search found 4 matches
- Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:56 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: ICD3 instead ICD2
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5036
Re: ICD3 instead ICD2
Ok, thanks Wolfgang
- Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:10 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: ICD3 instead ICD2
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5036
Re: ICD3 instead ICD2
Hello saschech
You mean that I can use the in circuit debugger (not just simulate) with the USB connection if I have a EB006 V7 ? I don't need the ICD2 connection ?
Thanks
You mean that I can use the in circuit debugger (not just simulate) with the USB connection if I have a EB006 V7 ? I don't need the ICD2 connection ?
Thanks
- Mon Sep 14, 2009 4:29 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: ICD3 instead ICD2
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5036
Re: ICD3 instead ICD2
Thanks for your answer.
You mean that if want to use the in circuit debugger with flowcode V4, I must have a picKit3 (or 2) instead of a ICD3 (or 2) ?
You mean that if want to use the in circuit debugger with flowcode V4, I must have a picKit3 (or 2) instead of a ICD3 (or 2) ?
- Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:47 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: ICD3 instead ICD2
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5036
ICD3 instead ICD2
Hello,
I would like to know if the in circuit debuger still works with the new MPLAB ICD3 instead of the MPLAB ICD2 ?
Thanks
Philippe
I would like to know if the in circuit debuger still works with the new MPLAB ICD3 instead of the MPLAB ICD2 ?
Thanks
Philippe