Benj,
Add 1 additional vote for Freescale Kinetis KL family of parts. My company is adding this set of chips for new platform development. It would benefit me as test engineer to have the flowcode tool for these as well.
Also, I know this is an ARM Debate but are there any plans for AVR32? My ...
Search found 16 matches
- Thu Jun 19, 2014 1:18 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V6
- Topic: ARM Debate
- Replies: 29
- Views: 27387
- Wed Jun 18, 2014 3:03 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V6
- Topic: ARM Debate
- Replies: 29
- Views: 27387
Re: ARM Debate
Hi Benj,
I'm using PSoC Creator 3.0 only at the moment. My C skills are lacking so I need the training wheels.....
Jeff
I'm using PSoC Creator 3.0 only at the moment. My C skills are lacking so I need the training wheels.....
Jeff
- Tue Jun 17, 2014 5:27 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V6
- Topic: ARM Debate
- Replies: 29
- Views: 27387
Re: ARM Debate
Hi Benj,
Looks like you have had a look at the Cypress PSoC Devices. Yes, they are a kind of hybrid micro/fpga/clpd. I'm just starting with them, but the combination of hardware components and graphical software interface make them very attractive for many smaller projects. The price is right too ...
Looks like you have had a look at the Cypress PSoC Devices. Yes, they are a kind of hybrid micro/fpga/clpd. I'm just starting with them, but the combination of hardware components and graphical software interface make them very attractive for many smaller projects. The price is right too ...
- Mon Jun 16, 2014 5:02 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V6
- Topic: ARM Debate
- Replies: 29
- Views: 27387
Re: ARM Debate
Cypress is now combining ARM cores with PSoC technology. Perhaps you could add Flowcode functionality to them as well.
http://www.cypress.com/psoc4/?source=CY-ENG-HEADER
http://www.cypress.com/psoc4/?source=CY-ENG-HEADER
- Tue Mar 25, 2014 6:14 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V6
- Topic: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9170
Re: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
Hi Benj,
Ver 6.06 seems to have solved many issues, including this one. Thanks. Good work!
Jeff
Ver 6.06 seems to have solved many issues, including this one. Thanks. Good work!
Jeff
- Wed Mar 19, 2014 1:42 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V6
- Topic: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9170
Re: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
Hi Benj,
If I write all 0s or FD to portB after each rx/tx loop the COMMs work without error. Also, I have noticed that the auto clear watchdog status can cause compile errors depending on which delay time you choose. For example, a 10mSec dealy will not compile with the box checked, but a 500mSec ...
If I write all 0s or FD to portB after each rx/tx loop the COMMs work without error. Also, I have noticed that the auto clear watchdog status can cause compile errors depending on which delay time you choose. For example, a 10mSec dealy will not compile with the box checked, but a 500mSec ...
- Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:40 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V6
- Topic: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9170
Re: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
Hello Benj,
Downloaded your version of the program and got an error trying to open it..... "Failed to open document. Attribute <start> is not found"
Thanks,
Jeff
Downloaded your version of the program and got an error trying to open it..... "Failed to open document. Attribute <start> is not found"
Thanks,
Jeff
- Tue Mar 18, 2014 10:04 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V6
- Topic: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9170
Re: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
Benj,
Thanks for your efforts to resolve this problem, but I still get the same results with the program that I up-loaded to you yesterday. I change the output port from C to B and back again to no avail.
When I use portC the loop runs about 4 times before the COMMs stop working. When I use portB ...
Thanks for your efforts to resolve this problem, but I still get the same results with the program that I up-loaded to you yesterday. I change the output port from C to B and back again to no avail.
When I use portC the loop runs about 4 times before the COMMs stop working. When I use portB ...
- Tue Mar 18, 2014 2:52 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V6
- Topic: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9170
Re: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
Hi Benj,
Any luck with the datasheet dive? I've been looking into it and it does seem to me that this could be a setup issue. Do you have a lot of Atmel users?
Thanks,
Jeff
Any luck with the datasheet dive? I've been looking into it and it does seem to me that this could be a setup issue. Do you have a lot of Atmel users?
Thanks,
Jeff
- Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:32 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V6
- Topic: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9170
Re: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
Benj,
After downloading your file and re-starting FC, I recompiled the program I just uploaded and got this compiler result....
See attached.
Jeff
After downloading your file and re-starting FC, I recompiled the program I just uploaded and got this compiler result....
See attached.
Jeff
- Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:18 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V6
- Topic: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9170
Re: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
Benj,
This program compiled without error, after programming to chip, it worked for a few loops then stopped working........
Let me know if you find anything.
Jeff
This program compiled without error, after programming to chip, it worked for a few loops then stopped working........
Let me know if you find anything.
Jeff
- Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:04 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V6
- Topic: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9170
Re: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
Benj,
I know you may find this hard to believe, but when I change the delays back to 1 sec and re-compiled it work without errors. I loaded it into the chip and the blink program is working properly.
I have noticed that I get compiler errors for delays from time to time depending which scale and ...
I know you may find this hard to believe, but when I change the delays back to 1 sec and re-compiled it work without errors. I loaded it into the chip and the blink program is working properly.
I have noticed that I get compiler errors for delays from time to time depending which scale and ...
- Mon Mar 17, 2014 5:24 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V6
- Topic: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9170
Re: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
Hi Benj,
I have the 8MHz int osc selected. the blink test works fine. I did have to use 1000msec as the delay. I receive compiler errors when I choose 1 sec for the delay... I find that odd as well.
I program the device with the JTAGICE3 through Atmel Studio 6.1. I have verified via JTAGICE3 that ...
I have the 8MHz int osc selected. the blink test works fine. I did have to use 1000msec as the delay. I receive compiler errors when I choose 1 sec for the delay... I find that odd as well.
I program the device with the JTAGICE3 through Atmel Studio 6.1. I have verified via JTAGICE3 that ...
- Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:21 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V6
- Topic: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9170
Re: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
Hi Benj,
Thanks for the response. I'm re-posting my reply as I don't see the first one. Just got back from Department meeting.
I did indeed use the icon to output to portb. I don't have any devices connected to portB, just the LEDs from the STK500 development board.
I thought the UART is on portD 0 ...
Thanks for the response. I'm re-posting my reply as I don't see the first one. Just got back from Department meeting.
I did indeed use the icon to output to portb. I don't have any devices connected to portB, just the LEDs from the STK500 development board.
I thought the UART is on portD 0 ...
- Mon Mar 17, 2014 3:00 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V6
- Topic: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9170
Re: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
Hi Benj,
Yes I am using the output icon to output to portB. Right now I'm not using any specific component on portb, just testing commands for COMM interface.
Also, I thought the TX/RX were on portD.0&1. The data sheet has a section on how to "override" the alternate functions of portb, but I'm not ...
Yes I am using the output icon to output to portB. Right now I'm not using any specific component on portb, just testing commands for COMM interface.
Also, I thought the TX/RX were on portD.0&1. The data sheet has a section on how to "override" the alternate functions of portb, but I'm not ...
- Mon Mar 17, 2014 1:39 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V6
- Topic: ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9170
ATMEGA16A PORTB Conflicts?
Hello All,
I'm working with the ATMEGA16A & ATMEGA8515L. The latest patch for FC6 fixed most of the problems I have had while trying to develop a COMM interface (RS232) to control the on-board hardware, but I still have one issue left. It seems that there is a conflict with the alternate PORTB ...
I'm working with the ATMEGA16A & ATMEGA8515L. The latest patch for FC6 fixed most of the problems I have had while trying to develop a COMM interface (RS232) to control the on-board hardware, but I still have one issue left. It seems that there is a conflict with the alternate PORTB ...