Hi Ben,
This ICD feature looks really interesting.
At the ned of your video, you mention that it may require a custom file to work with certain microcontrollers.
My projects are mostly using PICs and controlleres that all have UART which I typically dump diagnostics out to through an FTDI Serial ...
Search found 253 matches
- Thu Jul 02, 2026 1:05 pm
- Forum: Tips & Tricks
- Topic: Flowcode 11 Serial In Circuit Debug (ICD)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3519
- Tue Jun 16, 2026 2:59 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: App Developer - Text Array / Values Table
- Replies: 5
- Views: 12827
Re: App Developer - Text Array / Values Table
Ah... yeah. Mostly I thinking for PC developer. Which may be on a different development path to Web Dev. J.
- Tue Jun 16, 2026 12:17 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: App Developer - Text Array / Values Table
- Replies: 5
- Views: 12827
Re: App Developer - Text Array / Values Table
Hi, I noted from another post that App Dev may seen some more development soon, so a cheeky bump for this idea.
A simple user defined array of textboxes, x Columns * Y Rows.
With a macro that populates each cell with a text string or value.

A simple user defined array of textboxes, x Columns * Y Rows.
With a macro that populates each cell with a text string or value.
- Thu Dec 11, 2025 12:14 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: C Based Delay - with and Without Timers
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7977
Re: C Based Delay - with and Without Timers
Yeah, I'm definatly staying within standard FC as much as I can. I'm an engineer, certainly no coder! Sadly the single Hardware UART is being used to drive a LIN output. J.
- Thu Dec 11, 2025 10:33 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: C Based Delay - with and Without Timers
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7977
Re: C Based Delay - with and Without Timers
Well, I still can't get any Software driven UART type to send out anything with the correct Bit timing for 19200 or above.
I would have though a PIC running at 32MHz should have been able to do that?
Running in HS PLL mode is painful since I'm not sure if the FC internal delays/timers ...
I would have though a PIC running at 32MHz should have been able to do that?
Running in HS PLL mode is painful since I'm not sure if the FC internal delays/timers ...
- Thu Dec 11, 2025 9:53 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: C Based Delay - with and Without Timers
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7977
Re: C Based Delay - with and Without Timers
I'm going down this rabbit hole a bit further to improve my understanding and I 'think' I'm getting there!
This needs two instuction cycles, which may explain the larger value I got previously.
LATC6 = 1;
NOP();
LATC6 = 0;
I think this is closer to a single instruction delay and is my TRUE ...
This needs two instuction cycles, which may explain the larger value I got previously.
LATC6 = 1;
NOP();
LATC6 = 0;
I think this is closer to a single instruction delay and is my TRUE ...
- Thu Dec 11, 2025 9:11 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: C Based Delay - with and Without Timers
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7977
Re: C Based Delay - with and Without Timers
Hi, Thanks Martin, Leigh,
As you both stated the method used signiicantly effects the duration of very short pulses.
A) toggling single bit of Port C, using the FC output command and delay using a single NOP(); in a C code box. Result a Pulse of : 998nS
B) toggling a bit using "LATC6" and Delay ...
As you both stated the method used signiicantly effects the duration of very short pulses.
A) toggling single bit of Port C, using the FC output command and delay using a single NOP(); in a C code box. Result a Pulse of : 998nS
B) toggling a bit using "LATC6" and Delay ...
- Wed Dec 10, 2025 8:34 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: C Based Delay - with and Without Timers
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7977
Re: C Based Delay - with and Without Timers
Thanks Steve, I got 1uS (998ns) on a single "NOP();" so there is potentially something funky going on. J.
- Wed Dec 10, 2025 5:53 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: C Based Delay - with and Without Timers
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7977
C Based Delay - with and Without Timers
Hi,
Side task whilst debugging my test rig. :)
How can I create a micro second delay in C code. I wish to avoid the FC Delay function, to exclude that from my investigation.
A) One method that uses the PIC timer.
B) Second method that avoid the using Timers.
Maybe a known loop count of 100 or ...
Side task whilst debugging my test rig. :)
How can I create a micro second delay in C code. I wish to avoid the FC Delay function, to exclude that from my investigation.
A) One method that uses the PIC timer.
B) Second method that avoid the using Timers.
Maybe a known loop count of 100 or ...
- Wed Dec 10, 2025 4:16 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: FC11 Software UART Bit Timing?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1975
Re: FC11 Software UART Bit Timing?
Hi Ben,
Please move this to another Forum section if its no longer a bug issue. thanks, J.
FOsc 20MHz, HS Mode. No PLL.
I'm 95% sure clock is correct as this also clocks the hardware UART with No issues.
I measure these values on the scope when using the Hardware UART. All of these Work Great ...
Please move this to another Forum section if its no longer a bug issue. thanks, J.
FOsc 20MHz, HS Mode. No PLL.
I'm 95% sure clock is correct as this also clocks the hardware UART with No issues.
I measure these values on the scope when using the Hardware UART. All of these Work Great ...