Hello FC9 Users.
In the COM PORT component, the original HANDLE is “UART-COMPort1”.
But if we try to modify it to “PortaSer1” for example, it isn’t correctly recorded on the “Console User Input” TAB, continuing display the original name. Is this the normal behavior ?
Thanks for any tip.
COM Port handle not correct recorded ?
-
- Posts: 29
- http://meble-kuchenne.info.pl
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2020 10:38 pm
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
-
- Matrix Staff
- Posts: 1760
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 10:06 am
- Has thanked: 447 times
- Been thanked: 607 times
Re: COM Port handle not correct recorded ?
Hello,
Thanks for letting us know, I've hopefully sorted for you now via the help -> library updates.
I've now changed the console name so it should show the component name and then the COM port number.
e.g. PortaSer1 - COM10
Thanks for letting us know, I've hopefully sorted for you now via the help -> library updates.
I've now changed the console name so it should show the component name and then the COM port number.
e.g. PortaSer1 - COM10
Regards Ben Rowland - MatrixTSL
Flowcode Online Code Viewer (Beta) - Flowcode Product Page - Flowcode Help Wiki - My YouTube Channel
Flowcode Online Code Viewer (Beta) - Flowcode Product Page - Flowcode Help Wiki - My YouTube Channel
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2020 10:38 pm
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: COM Port handle not correct recorded ?
Thank you for fixing the Console handle issue, and adding the COM Port in use. Very useful.
But there is still a doubt. Why after the transmission of the console´s five lines to COM Port only line 2 jumped, and the others continued on the same line ?
But there is still a doubt. Why after the transmission of the console´s five lines to COM Port only line 2 jumped, and the others continued on the same line ?
- Attachments
-
- before RUN.PNG (66.54 KiB) Viewed 1401 times
-
- after RUN.PNG (58.44 KiB) Viewed 1401 times
-
- Matrix Staff
- Posts: 1760
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 10:06 am
- Has thanked: 447 times
- Been thanked: 607 times
Re: COM Port handle not correct recorded ?
Hello,
Thanks for letting us know. I've added a new property to the COM port component now that checks the type of new line being sent. This should hopefully now catch and process the \n line feed correctly for you.
Thanks for letting us know. I've added a new property to the COM port component now that checks the type of new line being sent. This should hopefully now catch and process the \n line feed correctly for you.
Regards Ben Rowland - MatrixTSL
Flowcode Online Code Viewer (Beta) - Flowcode Product Page - Flowcode Help Wiki - My YouTube Channel
Flowcode Online Code Viewer (Beta) - Flowcode Product Page - Flowcode Help Wiki - My YouTube Channel
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2020 10:38 pm
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: COM Port handle not correct recorded ?
Hi Ben. Thank you for your answer, but it wasn´t this time.
I dealt with two notebooks with FC9. Even trying with the two line feed options in "Console" and "COM Port", after RUN the lines are positioning themselves on the second line only.
I dealt with two notebooks with FC9. Even trying with the two line feed options in "Console" and "COM Port", after RUN the lines are positioning themselves on the second line only.
- Attachments
-
- before RUN.PNG (213.74 KiB) Viewed 1360 times
-
- after RUN.PNG (75.88 KiB) Viewed 1360 times
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2020 10:38 pm
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: COM Port handle not correct recorded ?
Thanks anyway. It may be that this type of implementation isn´t worth as much for practical applications. Thanks again.