Search found 126 matches
- Tue Apr 28, 2026 5:19 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Discrepancy in the PICO Toolchain Install Flowcode Help File
- Replies: 2
- Views: 149
Re: Discrepancy in the PICO Toolchain Install Flowcode Help File
Ah OK! That clears that up. Thanks Steve.
- Tue Apr 28, 2026 3:39 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Discrepancy in the PICO Toolchain Install Flowcode Help File
- Replies: 2
- Views: 149
Discrepancy in the PICO Toolchain Install Flowcode Help File
There is a confusing discrepancy in the PICO Toolchain Install Flowcode Help File. In the section re. installing MS VS Build Tools the document states: "You must install the full "Windows 10 SDK" package and leave the path as the default value" However, over on the right in the I...
- Mon Apr 27, 2026 1:40 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: PICO Toolchain Install Advice please
- Replies: 0
- Views: 393
PICO Toolchain Install Advice please
I've been reading through the PICO Toolchain install documentation https://flowcode.co.uk/wiki/index.php?title=Pico_Toolchain and I see the section that indicates if you have Python 3 already installed, as I have for my ESP32 development, then skip the installation of Python 3.9.6 However, my Python...
- Wed Apr 22, 2026 9:14 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Professional License chip packs question and continual running costs outlay
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1059
Re: Professional License chip packs question and continual running costs outlay
made up github URL for me to go and visit it for where the font should be living
You have to be pulling my leg Ben. Seriously??? ROTFALMOL
You have to be pulling my leg Ben. Seriously??? ROTFALMOL
- Wed Apr 22, 2026 11:32 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Professional License chip packs question and continual running costs outlay
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1059
Re: Professional License chip packs question and continual running costs outlay
Steve it was the Google Search AI generated overview. My mistake! Should have known better. Just done three searches on the comparison between the two licences and got different bumph each time although interestingly when I type Matrix flowcode professional versus free version into Google the AI is ...
- Wed Apr 22, 2026 10:41 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Professional License chip packs question and continual running costs outlay
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1059
Re: Professional License chip packs question and continual running costs outlay
Thanks Steve I think I have a better understanding of the Software Assurance Cost now. I was thinking the discount of that cost amounted to 35% off the full price of the of the purchase as seen by a newcomer but I think what you are saying is that on the next version upgrade the upgrade cost will ha...
- Tue Apr 21, 2026 8:43 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Professional License chip packs question and continual running costs outlay
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1059
Re: Professional License chip packs question and continual running costs outlay
Thanks Ben. I think there are semi professional people here who want the professional features but technically are not commercial operators - of which I am one. In that capacity we don't have a business or company where the cost of Flowcode can be offset against business taxes. The cost is a direct ...
- Tue Apr 21, 2026 6:41 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Professional License chip packs question and continual running costs outlay
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1059
Professional License chip packs question and continual running costs outlay
Been reading online the differences between the free and pro licenses and I see this quoted: "Access to wider chip packs for diverse development needs." I was under the impression that regardless of the type of license adopted if you want a device not provided with the free maker option th...
- Sun Apr 19, 2026 10:38 pm
- Forum: Projects - Embedded
- Topic: Microchip xc16 compiler settings with Flowcode 11
- Replies: 8
- Views: 810
Re: Microchip xc16 compiler settings with Flowcode 11
Martin. You ARE a G E N I U S !!!! That does it! It's working. Thank you so much.
Charles
Charles
- Sun Apr 19, 2026 6:37 pm
- Forum: Projects - Embedded
- Topic: Microchip xc16 compiler settings with Flowcode 11
- Replies: 8
- Views: 810
Re: Microchip xc16 compiler settings with Flowcode 11
OK just realised those last settings you quoted are the latest batchfile from Flowcode 11. That doesn't work with the external Microchip directory. I tried that bat file yesterday. When I run the compiler from Flowcode it gives similar errors. The actual output text is:- D:\Downloads>REM DATE: 25\03...